Quantcast The Review

Controversy surrounds speakers at Middle East panel

Alison Militano
Issue date: 11/9/07 Section: News
  • Print
  • Email
Asaf Ramirowsky's invitation to speak at a discussion panel was rescinded.
Media Credit: Courtesy of Asaf Ramirowsky
Asaf Ramirowsky's invitation to speak at a discussion panel was rescinded.

There is growing confusion concerning recent actions that involved a discussion panel at the university on Oct. 24.

Lara Rausch, president of the College Republicans, said the group hosted various events as part of Terrorism Awareness Week. One event that occurred on Oct. 24 was a panel titled "Understanding Anti-Americanism in the Middle East," co-sponsored by the College Democrats, Students of Western Civilizations and the Muslim Student Association.

Political science professor Muqtedar Khan was invited to speak at the panel, but after learning Israeli Defense Force veteran Asaf Romirowsky would also be speaking, he sent an e-mail message to Rausch explaining he was hesitant to appear with Romirowsky.

Khan said he never approached university officials with his concerns and instead directed his response to the College Republicans.

"I never e-mailed the university," he said. "They were never involved."

Khan said he e-mailed Rausch when he first received an e-mail message from her concerning the panel.

"Mr. Romirowsky was confirmed the night before the event," Rausch said. "I sent out an e-mail [message] to our three confirmed speakers about Mr. Romirowsky's confirmation and final details about the panel, when Dr. Kahn replied back to be with his e-mail [message]."

"I am also not sure how I feel about being on the same panel with an Israeli soldier who was stationed in West Bank," Kahn stated in his e-mail message. "I am not sure that I will be comfortable occupying the same space as him. It is not fair to spring this surprise on me at the last moment."

After Kahn's e-mail, Romirowsky's invitation to the panel was rescinded.

Romirowsky, a research fellow at the Middle East Forum in Philadelphia, said he believes it was an act of intolerance that his invitation was withdrawn.

"The panel is trying to show a wide range of opinions from all walks of life," he said. "It's important to hear what all people have to say. It just makes sense to me."

Kahn said he was not against debating with people of opposing views, but needed more time to prepare for such a situation.

"I have no problems in debating," he said. "I would just need time to adjust my lecture and topic depending on who the people were on the panel, and I didn't have time to do so."
Page 1 of 2 next >

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 2 of 2

Elliott H. Snyder, M.D., BSChemistiry UD '69

posted 11/28/07 @ 12:38 AM EST

As an alumnus I was distressed to learn of the disinvitation of the Israeli to participate in the panel. Living in Texas, I rarely hear about the UofD on national news. (Continued…)

Yeah but

posted 11/28/07 @ 1:44 AM EST

What is wrong with being uncomfortable?
If I was given an assignment and told the day before it was due that there was new requirements, I would be uncomfortable. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Issue Summary

News

Mosaic

Sports

Editorial

Advertisement

Poll

Do you think more primaries increase interest in the election?
Submit Vote

View Results

What are you worth?
Job title
All titles
ZIP Code
ByStudents - Give your perspective of Delaware. Have your voice heard by thousands.

Advertisement